Living in a world that is full of different types of transportation, it’s no surprise that accidents can happen quickly. Car accidents involving pedestrians are not unheard of. It often leads to discussions about who is liable for the accident. Is it possible for a pedestrian to be held liable? It can be a tough question to answer considering there are loads of circumstances to determine who is at fault. It’s important to understand the several factors that come into play when assessing pedestrian liability in car accidents. That way you can keep yourself protected if something like this happens to you.
The Principle of Negligence
The only way to understand who is at fault in these types of situations is to learn the principle of negligence. This refers to the failure of reasonable care by another party, resulting in someone being harmed. This can be as simple as another person not paying attention or something major like a car accident. When it comes to accidents involving a driver and a pedestrian, negligence could be attributed to either person. Which causes some issues when figuring out who is owed for the damages. It all depends on the situation and how the accident started in the first place.
Factors Affecting Pedestrian Liability
Pedestrians, like drivers, are expected to follow certain rules and exercise caution to ensure their safety and the safety of those around them. However, there are scenarios in which pedestrians could be found liable for a car accident. Crossing the street outside designated crosswalks or against traffic signals can significantly increase the risk of an accident. If a pedestrian’s jaywalking contributes to a collision, they might be deemed partially at fault. Just as distracted driving is dangerous, distracted walking can also lead to accidents. Pedestrians engrossed in their smartphones or other distractions may not notice oncoming traffic, potentially leading to an accident for which they could share some blame.
Walking under the influence of alcohol or drugs can impair a pedestrian’s judgment and coordination, increasing the likelihood of an accident. This could cause a pedestrian to be considered liable. If a pedestrian suddenly darts into traffic without warning, a driver might not have sufficient time to react and avoid a collision. Such unpredictable actions could lead to shared liability, with the pedestrian being partially responsible. Ignoring “Walk” and “Don’t Walk” signals at crosswalks can place pedestrians at risk. If a pedestrian crosses against a red signal and gets hit, their failure to adhere to traffic rules might influence the liability determination.
In cases where both the pedestrian and the driver share some degree of fault, the legal principle of comparative negligence comes into play. Comparative negligence assigns a percentage of blame to each party involved based on their contribution to the accident. The compensation awarded to the injured party is then adjusted according to their assigned percentage of fault. For instance, if a pedestrian is found 20% responsible for the accident and the driver 80%, the pedestrian’s potential compensation would be reduced by 20%. This is a great way for people to understand who is at fault and how much they owe for the accident.
The question of who is at fault in a pedestrian accident doesn’t necessarily have a straight answer. There are loads of details to consider before fully blaming someone. The determination depends on whether the pedestrian was paying attention or if the driver was following basic traffic laws. Both parties need to make sure they are the duty of care and keeping everyone safe. Failure to do so can lead to serious consequences that can cause harm. Preventing these types of accidents requires all parties to abide by the rules. Once that is determined, then liability can play a huge role in figuring out who the guilty party is.